Manuel Plunger vs Maxwell Mckennon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Nov at 06:40 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Plunger vs M. Mckennon

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Plunger 1 - 0 Mckennon
They have played 1 sets in total, with Manuel Plunger winning 1 and Maxwell Mckennon winning 0. The last match between Manuel Plunger and Maxwell Mckennon was at the M25 Manzanillo, 13-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Manuel Plunger getting the victory 7-5 5-5 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Plunger | 1 |
| Mckennon | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Manzanillo(11-13-25)
M. Plunger vs M. Mckennon H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.36% (62-48) | Career Total W/L | 54.86% (79-65) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Plunger vs M. Mckennon Match Preview:
- How do their recent second serve stats compare? Manuel Plunger has a second serve win rate of 44.17%, slightly lower than Maxwell Mckennon's 45.13%.
- Who excels in return games? Manuel Plunger shows superior performance by winning 51.18% of opponent's second serves and 25.14% of first serves, in contrast to Mckennon's 40.28% and 21.83% respectively.
- What about their defense under pressure? Maxwell Mckennon saves 52.67% of breakpoints, outperforming Plunger's 45.95%, a key element for in-game betting.
- Considering overall performance, Mckennon has a better win-loss ratio of 57.14% over the past year, compared to Plunger's 44.44%.
- On which surface are they strongest? Both excel on their best surfaces with 56% wins; Plunger on Clay and Mckennon on Indoor Hard.
- Analyzing player levels, Mckennon has a higher 62.22% success rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events compared to Plunger’s 44.44%.
- Regarding opponent quality, Plunger has faced tougher competition, playing against an average rank of 325.33, while Mckennon's average rank of opponents is 386.48.
- Both Plunger and Mckennon have an equal rate of winning deciding sets at 50%.
Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the highly anticipated match between Manuel Plunger and Maxwell Mckennon, several aspects come into focus.
Mckennon's edge in breakpoint defense and overall win percentage in the past year suggests a higher resilience and recent streak of success in similar tournaments.
However, Plunger's pronounced return game strength could be a deciding factor, especially against Mckennon's slightly stronger second serve.
Ultimately, given Mckennon's superior performance under pressure and higher win rate in events at similar levels, he emerges as the likely candidate to prevail in this encounter.
Manuel Plunger vs Maxwell Mckennon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Plunger vs M. Mckennon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:7:3 | Average Match Time | 2:7:3 |
| 66% (40/61) | 1st Serve % | 51% (32/63) |
| 78% (31/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (24/32) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (14/31) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 40% (25/63) | Return Points Win % | 31% (19/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Plunger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 5-5 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 2-6 10-7 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
M. Mckennon Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 5-5 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||

M. Plunger vs M. Mckennon Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.36% (62/48) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.86% (79/65) |
| 55.56% (135/108) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.10% (173/141) |
| 52.25% (1206/1102) | Games Win/Loss | 52.91% (1544/1374) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.62% (71/59) |
| 55.79% (53/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 129 | Aces Total | 508 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 189 | Total Double Faults | 406 |
| 1:10:59 | Average Match Time | 1:25:15 |
| 221.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.29 |
| 64% (2973/4616) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4422/7347) |
| 63% (1864/2973) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (3188/4422) |
| 48% (787/1643) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1527/2925) |
| 44% (225/517) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (279/687) |
| 42% (2005/4731) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2801/7407) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (12/14) |
| 56.36% (62/48) | Futures W/L | 56.78% (67/51) |
| 55% (59/107) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (79/139) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 56% (10/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (16/37) |
| 46% (12/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 86% (65/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (82/73) |
| 14% (65/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (82/9) |
| 11% (45/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (62/6) |